What the detectives did not know that cold February morning, however, was that I had heard countless stories of childhood victimization, mostly from the women I worked with in a prison setting. The impact of childhood sexual exploitation can be codified in the details of their drug and criminal records. None of them escaped without harm. Not one. The devastation lasts a lifetime. Pornography, no matter how "tame" some would judge it to be is never without victims, especially child pornography.
Yet how often, as a society, do we minimize or trivialize the seriousness of a media presentation containing child nudity? How often do we determine just how serious the crime is based on how offensive we judge the material to be? Isn't that a technical definition of pornography--material that a "normal" person would find offensive? Is child nudity in a sexual context ever innocent or non-offensive? For a pedophile any image of a child, nude or fully clothed, can be sexualized so where do we draw the line?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9a86/b9a86641e6d98809ce88b0afa17bbf51488237a5" alt=""
"I knew better but I did it anyway; I couldn't help myself," is an excuse often given by the one caught in a pornography sting. I've heard variations of that from the addict I was previously married to. But this time, I'm glad I went ahead and watched something that I knew would trigger my trauma. I need to be reminded. There are children to be protected, and some of them are very dear to my heart.
No comments:
Post a Comment